What's New | Decker

2021 introduced changes to E/M billing that place greater importance on medical decision making.
The COVID-19 Pandemic accelerated the use of Telehealth and development of associated coding strategies.
ICD-10-CM became commonly used in the US in 2015 and ICD-11 will begin utilization in the coming years.

Randomized trials studying medical therapies to improve walking performance in patients with PAD have traditionally used treadmill walking performance as the primary outcome measure. Clinical trials of medical therapies in PAD have also measured changes in quality of life, patient perceived walking performance in daily life, the 6-minute walk, and other functional outcomes.
Two medications are FDA-approved for treating claudication symptoms in people with PAD: pentoxifylline and cilostazol. Pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivative, was FDA-approved in 1984 for treating intermittent claudication symptoms due to PAD. Pentoxifylline lowers blood viscosity by increasing red blood cell deformability and flexibility. Cilostazol is a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor that was FDA-approved in 1999 for treating walking impairment due to intermittent claudication symptoms in patients with PAD.

Randomized trials studying medical therapies to improve walking performance in patients with PAD have traditionally used treadmill walking performance as the primary outcome measure. Clinical trials of medical therapies in PAD have also measured changes in quality of life, patient perceived walking performance in daily life, the 6-minute walk, and other functional outcomes.
Two medications are FDA-approved for treating claudication symptoms in people with PAD: pentoxifylline and cilostazol. Pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivative, was FDA-approved in 1984 for treating intermittent claudication symptoms due to PAD. Pentoxifylline lowers blood viscosity by increasing red blood cell deformability and flexibility. Cilostazol is a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor that was FDA-approved in 1999 for treating walking impairment due to intermittent claudication symptoms in patients with PAD.

Randomized trials studying medical therapies to improve walking performance in patients with PAD have traditionally used treadmill walking performance as the primary outcome measure. Clinical trials of medical therapies in PAD have also measured changes in quality of life, patient perceived walking performance in daily life, the 6-minute walk, and other functional outcomes.
Two medications are FDA-approved for treating claudication symptoms in people with PAD: pentoxifylline and cilostazol. Pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivative, was FDA-approved in 1984 for treating intermittent claudication symptoms due to PAD. Pentoxifylline lowers blood viscosity by increasing red blood cell deformability and flexibility. Cilostazol is a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor that was FDA-approved in 1999 for treating walking impairment due to intermittent claudication symptoms in patients with PAD.

Although borderline personality disorder has traditionally been perceived as difficult or impossible to treat, significant progress has been made in developing and validating treatments.
Specialized psychotherapy remains the treatment of choice.
Short-term or stepped care interventions may represent a more efficient treatment model.
Common factors, such as structured therapies, may be nearly as effective as specialized treatments.
Pharmacotherapy plays a limited role in treatment.

Use of HVPG to accurately diagnose portal hypertension
Child-Pugh score and MELD score in risk stratification and decision-making
Fibroelastography, multidetecter row CT scan, and capsule endoscopy as emerging modalities in detection of varices.

Use of HVPG to accurately diagnose portal hypertension
Child-Pugh score and MELD score in risk stratification and decision-making
Fibroelastography, multidetecter row CT scan, and capsule endoscopy as emerging modalities in detection of varices.

Even the most competent physician can be prone to misusing epidemiologic concepts. An example of inaccurate decision making, resting on Bayes’s theorem, occurred in a recent study in which primary care physicians were given clinical scenarios. Although the clinicians confidently provided their estimates of the probabilities of given disorders, no consensus could be found among the estimates. Another study assessed the ability of medical students, residents, and attending physicians to correctly determine the positive predictive value of a hypothetical screening test. The vast majority of respondents not only got the question wrong but also had an answer that would have led to the opposite clinical conclusions, guessing an incorrect positive predictive value of 95% when the true answer was 2%.

General